09/12/2026 / By Douglas Harrington

At least 105 civil denaturalization lawsuits were filed in federal district courts during the first seven months of 2026, including 50 in July alone, according to data published by Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) [1].
The organization previously reported that roughly 125 such lawsuits were filed nationwide between 2008 and 2025, meaning the current pace represents a sharp break from nearly two decades of limited use [2]. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has made denaturalization a priority under the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement efforts, issuing guidance in June 2025 directing attorneys to “prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence” [3].
In a two-week span between July 20 and Aug. 3, the department filed 25 denaturalization cases, which it described as the “largest denaturalization effort ever” [2]. The complaints alleged offenses including assault, attempted murder, battery and sexual assault, according to an Aug. 3 statement [2].
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services can identify and investigate potential cases, while the DOJ generally must initiate civil litigation to revoke citizenship [4]. Such cases typically allege that a person obtained citizenship through fraud, misrepresentation or concealment of material facts during the naturalization process [5].
If the government prevails, the person can lose U.S. citizenship and potentially face removal proceedings, depending on the circumstances [6]. Because denaturalization cases are filed in federal court, judges must determine whether the government has met the legal burden required to revoke citizenship [2]. Individuals targeted by such lawsuits can challenge the allegations and retain legal representation throughout the proceedings [7].
The legal standard requires clear and convincing evidence rather than proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and civil denaturalization cases have no recognized statute of limitations, according to Cassandra Burke Robertson, a professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law [8]. “For most of the last half-century, civil denaturalization was a tool of last resort, reserved largely for Nazi-era war criminals and a handful of egregious fraud cases,” Robertson told Newsweek [5].
USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler told Newsweek the agency “has a zero-tolerance policy for anyone who lies or misrepresents themselves during the naturalization process” [9].
“Under the leadership of President [Donald] Trump, USCIS is protecting public safety by more thoroughly screening and vetting all aliens,” Kahler said. “USCIS is working with the DOJ to aggressively pursue and recommend denaturalization of anyone who obtained citizenship through fraud. We will not take any shortcuts and continue to protect the American people from those who attempt to defraud them” [9].
Former senior USCIS official Ricky Murray told Newsweek the current pace reflects additional personnel, enhanced technology, new agency policies and a government-wide emphasis on reviewing prior adjudications [1]. “There are now more channels through which a potential denaturalization case can be identified, more specialized resources available to investigate it and fewer institutional barriers to litigation,” Murray said [1].
Former Department of Homeland Security official Adam Klein told Newsweek that centralized operational capability can be used more aggressively when an administration changes policy. “Once the government has built the machinery to identify, develop and refer these cases consistently, a change in policy can be operationalized much more quickly and at greater scale,” Klein said [10].
TRAC reported that lawsuits were filed in at least 37 states and the District of Columbia between January and July [11]. The 50 lawsuits filed in July followed 55 cases identified during the first six months of 2026, representing one of the largest monthly totals recorded since TRAC began tracking the data [12].
Florida recorded the highest number with 19 filings, followed by Texas and Maryland with 10 each. California, which recorded 21 denaturalization filings over the 2008-2025 period, has recorded five new cases this year [11].
The Migration Policy Institute estimates that about 25.8 million naturalized U.S. citizens lived in the United States in 2024, and USCIS naturalized 818,500 people in fiscal year 2024, while almost eight million immigrants became citizens over the past decade [13]. Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche told CBS News in May that the administration is pursuing more denaturalization cases than have been done in the last nine years [14].
The Brennan Center for Justice reported that the federal government initiated an average of about 11 denaturalization cases annually between 1990 and 2017, rising to roughly 25 cases per year during Trump’s first term [15].
Robertson told Newsweek the current pace is historically extraordinary, with comparable numbers not seen since the Supreme Court limited denaturalization in 1967 [8]. In Afroyim v. Rusk, the Supreme Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment protects a person’s right to remain a U.S. citizen unless that citizenship is voluntarily relinquished [16].
Robertson warned that higher filing volumes and enforcement targets could encourage marginal cases. “The people most likely to be caught in a marginal or weak case are the ones least able to defend one,” she said [8]. The professor added, “The biggest issue is that it makes citizenship feel less secure for naturalized citizens” [8].
The DOJ has also increased scrutiny of previously approved immigration cases, with USCIS establishing monthly denaturalization targets in December 2025 that appeared highly ambitious given the work required to investigate and prepare each case, Murray said [17].
The data from TRAC shows denaturalization filings at levels not recorded in modern times, with 105 cases in seven months compared to roughly 125 over the previous 17 years combined [1]. The DOJ has characterized its recent filing surge as the largest denaturalization effort in U.S. history [2].
USCIS has defended its approach as a matter of protecting public safety and enforcing the integrity of the naturalization process, while legal scholars have raised concerns about the security of citizenship for naturalized Americans [9][8]. The outcome of pending cases will be determined by federal judges applying the clear and convincing evidence standard, and individuals facing denaturalization retain the right to legal representation and the ability to challenge government allegations in court [7].

Tagged Under:
big government, deception, denaturalization, denaturalization lawsuits, Department of Justice, deportation, federal court, federal lawsuit, freedom, Immigration, legal action, Liberty, naturalization, naturalized citizens, removal proceedings, Syracuse University, Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Trump administration, US citizens, US Citizenship and Immigration Services
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 LIBERTY NEWS
